Medicine 2.0

July 03, 2009

Twitter: What's the use?

I am still getting use to Twitter which I use primarily to send blog postings to as another "feed".  I admit I do not "follow" those I am "following" on a daily basis but check in from time to time. 

This story from amednews.com talks about how a few clinicians use the application. 

Ibisa0629a 



Illustration by Jashar Awan / jasharawan.com

Early physician adopters say the social media site can help you promote your practice and communicate with colleagues

By Pamela Lewis Dolan, AMNews staff. Posted June 29, 2009.


As orthopedic surgeon Joel Wallskog, MD, surveyed the operating room at Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center before performing bilateral knee surgery, he spotted one addition to the usual crew: a hospital public relations staffer at a computer, posting Dr. Wallskog's surgical play-by-play live from Milwaukee onto the world of Twitter.

Given how the social media Web site has burst onto the national consciousness over the past few months, you probably know of Twitter but might not know what it's all about.

Twitter is a Web site that also can be accessed on a mobile device. People can create an account to share their thoughts, 140 characters at a time, to other Twitter users who sign up to "follow" that user's "tweets." Registration is free. Twitter accounts start with an "@" sign, and are promoted as "@username."

Physicians are among those jumping onto Twitter. If nothing else they want to see what the hype is about, or what the purpose is of blasting short, random thoughts to whoever opts to listen.

Most users, physicians and otherwise, don't tweet for very long. Data that the Nielsen Co. released in April found only about 40% of users were active a month after creating an account.

Twitter messages, called tweets, are limited to 140 characters.

Doctors who keep tweeting stick around because they find it can be useful. Physicians most often use Twitter as an extension of their Web presence, a patient communication site, a marketing tool or a virtual water cooler with their colleagues. Or, maybe a combination of all four.

"I recognize the power of having a community," said Bryan Vartabedian, MD, (@Doctor_V) pediatric gastroenterologist at Texas Children's Hospital and assistant professor of pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine. "I didn't realize when I first went on Twitter that there is a lot of strength and a lot of power in having these sorts of connections."

Aurora Health Care, parent of Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, is one of a handful of hospital systems that have detailed surgeries on Twitter. It's an inexpensive and easy way to connect with patients, and potential patients, and perhaps get a little media buzz.

Jamey Shiels, social media director for Aurora (@Aurora_Health) who helped organize Dr. Wallskog's twittered surgery in April, said traditional advertising does not result in a two-way conversation. It's more of a push, he said. The hospital saw Twitter as "an opportunity to move to a one-to-many conversation."

The procedure Aurora decided to tweet was not randomly selected. It was a new, less-invasive approach to bilateral knee replacement, using customized tools created from virtual images of the knee. The marketing team thought the novelty factor alone might draw some attention.

It did.

One hospital saw its Twitter following more than double a week after tweeting a surgery.

Aurora reported more than 180 questions and comments in reply to the 250 tweets posted during the surgery. At least 75 of its messages were forwarded, or sent as "retweets," by other Twitter users. This expands the reach to other groups of followers.

The hospital's surgery tweeting was profiled on ABC-TV's "Good Morning America" and got a mention on "The Oprah Winfrey Show." Within a week after the surgery, the number of Twitter users following Aurora grew from 930 to 2,240. By mid-June, that number had passed 3,900.

Within a month of the surgery, Dr. Wallskog saw at least 10 new patients, all potential candidates for the surgery. Dr. Wallskog suspects the seed has been planted, and as the year unfolds, more new patients will come for a consultation as a result of Twitter.

While several hospitals have established a presence for marketing purposes, few physicians are using Twitter for that. At least not yet.

Peter Beck Kim, MD (@doccottle), a family physician in Costa Mesa, Calif., said he started twittering as a way of connecting with other physicians interested in health IT issues. He can see himself eventually using Twitter as another way of interacting with patients, but not enough people are on yet.

"I think there's more out there [on Twitter] than not," Dr. Kim said. "But overall, in terms of my patient base, I wouldn't say it's a tiny minority, but it's a minority."

As the number of users grow there will be a larger pool of local users to connect with, he said.

Extension of a Web presence

Gwenn Schurgin O'Keeffe, MD, (@DrGwenn) a Massachusetts pediatrician who is CEO and editor of the Web site PediatricsNow, already had a pretty devoted Web following. She decided to join Twitter earlier this year as a way of extending her Dr. Gwenn brand.

Dr. O'Keeffe has made contacts through Twitter that have expanded her work as a writer and media source. Now she's weighing the question of how many contacts are too many.

While some Twitter users look for a core group of people who share similar interests, others join with the goal of having as many followers as possible. "It's like a big sales pitch," she said. "You can't filter out the noise from the real conversations."

But, the ability to reach thousands in one place is the real power of Twitter, said Wesley Young, MD (@DrWesYoung), an emergency physician in Honolulu. He's already seeing the benefits of getting your name onto as many platforms as possible, including blogs and Web sites, as well as Twitter.

Part of Dr. Young's practice involves conducting virtual visits through a telemedicine service started by Boston-based American Well and Hawaii Medical Service Assn., a Blue Cross Blue Shield-affiliated plan. One online patient said she chose him from the list of available physicians because she recognized his name from Twitter. "That is a foreshadowing of things to come," Dr. Young said.

Patient communication

Dr. Kim said he sees an increasing number of patients in his practice using smart phones to send text messages and surf the Web. While Twitter use has not yet reached critical mass, he intends to be on the cutting edge and use the site to communicate with patients who are interested in it.

"As an added service, I definitely think it can have an appeal if you are trying to market yourself as a physician saying, 'I will give you Twitter updates on things of interest to you [if] I find a health-related article' or 'I will give you a real-time update if I am running behind,' " Dr. Kim said.

But until local patients reach that critical mass, many physicians are using Twitter to communicate with anyone looking for information.

Dr. Young believes it should be the goal of every physician to educate the masses -- and Twitter is a good tool.

"One method of providing health education is through electronic media, which can multiply, if used properly, a single individual's efforts to promote healthy life choices," he said.

This ability to reach thousands of people with one message also can useful in times of public health scares. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other health organizations have turned to Twitter to help educate people about A(H1N1) flu, spread information and curb misinformation.

Unfortunately, Dr. O'Keeffe said, the Twitter-using public doesn't always differentiate qualified expert advice from unreliable chatter.

Dr. Vartabedian said he saw a number of physicians stepping in during the flu scare to "provide some sound balance to what was really, on Twitter, an amazing amount of hysteria." He sees local physicians, whom the local public knows and trusts, assuming that role more and more in the future.

Virtual water cooler

Physicians tend to gravitate to other physicians in most social networking mediums, and Twitter is no exception. But there are few curbside consults here. Besides the obvious privacy issues related to posting on a very public forum, there's limited dialogue opportunity within the 140-character limit. What you often find is the virtual version of office banter and the occasional sharing of links to useful resources.

"Most of the physicians I follow are not twittering as doctors, they are twittering as people who are doctors," said Dr. Vartabedian. "They talk about medical things and they link to medical things, but they aren't talking from a position of authority."

Many physicians believe embracing Twitter is just a part of practicing medicine in the 21st century and that, either in its present form or something similar to it, Twitter will be around for a long time to come. Others are not so sure.

"I think the chips are still out," Dr. O'Keeffe said. "It's kind of like an election where we're not going to see the results for a while."

Dr. Wallskog is an undecided voter.

He agreed to the tweeting of one of his surgeries because the idea was "quite unique and novel."

But a few weeks after the surgery, he found he hadn't used his Twitter account much.

"I'd love to say I'm regular twitterer," Dr. Wallskog said. "I am interested in kind of exploring it. It's just I don't have that much time to use that stuff."

The print version of this content appeared in the July 6, 2009 issue of American Medical News.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 

Twitter 101

Along with the rise of Twitter came the rise of the phrase "microblogging."

As with traditional bloggers, Twitter users can frequently update their accounts with information they want to share with readers, known as "followers." It's micro because users get only 140 characters per post.

To get started, create an account (www.twitter.com). You can use any name, up to 15 letters. This will form the extension for your home page, and will appear with an @ on all your postings, or tweets (as in @amednews or @AmerMedicalAssn).

Now you need to find people to "follow." You can use the search to look for specific names, or check through various Twitter groups to find people with similar interests. When you opt to follow someone, their updates will appear on your home page. You can track who you are following and who is following you.

Other people can opt to follow you and directly receive your updates. People without Twitter accounts also can also read your updates, simply by going to your page (www.twitter.com/amednews).

Depending on your reasons for being on Twitter, your updates could make use of the general question, "What are you doing?" Or, you can use updates to send information, such as links to stories or Web sites.

You can request that your updates be private and available only to a select group that you approve. If you do not do this, remember that everything you say can be read by anyone with an Internet connection.

-- Pamela Lewis Dolan (@Pdolan_amnews)


Business and pleasure

Howard Luks, MD, says the No. 1 consideration for physicians deciding whether to join Twitter should be the target audience. That's why he runs three separate accounts.

Dr. Luks is an associate professor for orthopedic surgery at New York Medical College in Valhalla, and he has a two-location orthopedic practice. Additionally, he's the medical director of iMedExchange, a social networking site for physicians. His presence on Twitter reflects his multifaceted life.

He maintains one account devoted to the practice of orthopedic medicine (@orthomed). Another is more of a social outlet where he discusses trends in health information technology and health policy (@hjluks). A third account is used to post about topics being discussed on iMedExchange (@imedexchange).

Other physician users keep all their Twitter traffic on one site. They say it can let patients know a little more about your personal side.

But Dr. Luks' rule remains true, no matter how many accounts you have: "In order to be a successful blogger or have a significant following, you have to have a consistent message, and you have to stay the course. If you are all over the place, and your content is not relevant, rational or believable, you are not going to develop a following."

June 10, 2009

Introducing PathXchange

Since first hearing and seeing this site in the BioImagene booth at USCAP have uploaded over 50 cases and the service provided for scanning and web hosting your cases has been top notch! 

Included in the cases I have had scanned to date is a soft tissue tumor study set with comments submitted on a few of the cases (I still need to respond to...) about the diagnosis, histogenesis or prognosis of the lesions. 

We also recently uploaded another set of 40 pancreas cases with 10 examples each of 3 different forms of pancreatitis and 10 cases of carcinoma for comparison.  One of the goals of this project is to include gastroenterologists to share in the discussion as well.  Another application I plan on using the site for is resident education as "unknown" cases.

Overall, a great service and site and another example of the Pathology 2.0 revolution - content by users, for users, sharing cases, knowledge, experience & collective experience.

To date, over 800 users have joined and 1200 cases have been uploaded to the site.  I encourage you to take a look for yourself.

Introducing PathXchange – bringing pathologists together online

PathXchange.org (Px) is professional networking portal for the global pathology community.  Think of it as YouTube and Facebook for pathology! Px brings the field of pathology into the digital age with Web 2.0 features:

·       Browse interesting cases from around the world

·       Create your own online case gallery

·       Share your cases and slides with colleagues

·       Search our expanding global knowledge base

·       Learn about the latest advances in the field

·       Ask experts for their opinion on your case

Creating and sharing a case in Px takes only a minute. In just a few clicks, you can upload case images that you captured using any device, in any format, whether they are area snapshots or whole slide images. If you have glass slides for your case – no problem! Just mail us your slides.  We will digitize and upload the images for you.

Join the fastest growing pathology community! Sign up now for a FREE membership:
www.PathXchange.org.

Sign up before June 11, 2009 for a chance to win an iPod Shuffle. Create and share a case before June 18, 2009 for a chance to win an iPod Touch.

About PathXchange.org
Px is not-for-profit and vendor neutral.  BioImagene Inc. is a proud Platinum Sponsor of the site.  If you have any questions or would like to learn more about Px, don’t hesitate to send us an email or call us at (408) 207.4272. You can also find more information about Px by visiting our site:
www.PathXchange.org

May 19, 2009

Platform allows patients, physicians to share diagnostic laboratory test results online

Healthcare IT News (5/15, Hardy) reported that, "through a joint effort by Quest Diagnostics and Microsoft HealthVault, patients and physicians can now share diagnostic laboratory test results online." Physicians "who use Care360, a patient-centric portal from...Quest Diagnostics, can transfer test results in a HIPAA-compliant format to a protected account per patient request." Meanwhile, "patients will be able to use this account to view past and present diagnostic laboratory records from their physicians." According to David Cerino, general manager of consumer health, Microsoft Health Solutions Group, "Lab results are one piece of the puzzle necessary to give people a complete picture of their health, which we are now able to deliver securely through the connection between Quest Diagnostics and HealthVault."

April 22, 2009

Pathology 2.0

This is an article I had an opportunity to write for ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory in conjunction with a recent article entitled "Integrating Digital Pathology" in this month's issue.  My thanks to the publisher and Kelly Graham, assistant editor.

I will also present this topic at the upcoming CAP Futurescape meeting this June.

The term "Web 2.0" refers to a perceived second generation of Web development and design that aims to facilitate communication, secure information sharing, offer ability and collaboration on the Internet. Web 2.0 concepts have led to the development and evolution of Web-based communities, hosted services and applications, such as social-networking sites, video-sharing sites, wikis and blogs.  

The term was first used by Dale Dougherty and Craig Cline and became notable after the O'Reilly Media Web suggested a new version of the World Wide Web. It does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but rather to changes in the way software developers and users utilize the Web.

According to time to Tim O'Reilly, "Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as a platform, and in an attempt to understand the worlds for success on that new platform." Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the Web, has questioned whether one can use the term in any meaningful way, since many of the technological components of Web 2.0 have existed since the early days of the Web.

Regardless of whether you view Web 2.0 as new or simply a modification of existing Internet technologies, Web 2.0 technologies allow users to do more than just retrieve information. The Web 2.0 tool/technologies allow content by users for users that is interactive and dynamic rather than static information being retrieved without input.

Changing Nature of Pathology

Because of the image-intense nature of anatomic pathology and traditional educational and clinical business practices (i.e., atlases, case sharing and consultation among colleagues), there is opportunity for incredible synergy between anatomic pathology and Web 2.0 technology vis-à-vis, Pathology 2.0.

The user-participatory nature of Web 2.0 allows for openness, freedom and collective intelligence. This expanded user experience, dynamic content and harnessing of collective intelligence in a simple fashion provide for the easy exchanged, sharing and delivery of all sorts of information with comment and discussion. Several examples of this currently exist, from image sharing sites on Flickr to Aperio's Second Slide consultation (www.secondslide.com) hosting service to BioImagene's PathXchange (www.pathxchange.org). Other examples that facilitate pathology image sharing include Med Pix (rad.usuhs.mil/medpix/) and Medting (www.medting.com). Sites such as MyPACS.net (www.mypacs.net) also allow for the creation of pathology teaching files in ways to data share and collaborate.

New Wave

Other technologies such as social media sites (Facebook and Youtube) also allow users to post and share collective intelligence for research, educational and clinical practice. Again, the ability for content by users for users in a simple and accessible format allow glass slides (more accurately, images derived from glass slides) to be shared and viewed in a way that extends beyond institutional walls takes advantage of Web 2.0.

My Digital Pathology Blog at www.tissuepathology.com serves to educate pathologists and the pathology community on the deliverables of digital pathology, current news and events and applications in education, research and clinical practice. This is a form of "academic blogging" that may be timely or relevant to interested audience participants. It also allows for collaboration between industry and practitioners to expand the community, enhance the discussion, promote the technology and offer opinion from my perspective while also allowing others to comment, criticize and share in an open and dynamic dialog. Blogging allows users to share content and ideas, gives others a sense of your own work and interests and in my case, as an academic pathologist, allows a platform for non-peer reviewed writing that is original and unedited content (for better or worse). This extends into other networking opportunities.

Certainly these are disruptive technologies that some may not be comfortable with or feel have a place in medicine or pathology. There is a level of transparency to which we all must grow accustomed that extends far beyond our own microscope and slide storage rooms. The real value is in the collective intelligence that can now be harnessed.

Web 2.0 is about the next generation of applications on the Internet, featuring user-generated content, collaboration and community and offers technology to expand our horizons and to showcase our specialty of anatomic pathology like never before.

February 09, 2009

Share your pathology images on Flickr group

Came across an interesting photo sharing group for some very good pathology images at Flickr.

Here is the snapshot on the group:

About Pathology and Lab Medicine

This public group is for images relating to the practice of diagnostic pathology and clinical laboratory medicine. Appropriate subjects include:

Gross specimens
Photomicrographs
Laboratory facilities, instruments, and equipment
People who work in the lab

Contributing members are encouraged to write detailed descriptions of their images and to comment on those of others. Also, please consider licensing your images by way of Creative Commons, so we can all use them for medical education and patient care.

This group is administered by Ed Uthman, MD, a practicing pathologist in Houston, Texas, USA.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/labmed/

January 29, 2009

Mayo Clinic launches new culture blog

In the past I have blogged about Mayo Clinic Facebook and Mayo Clinic YouTube channel and commented about the use of Web 2.0 tools at our institution.  As a brief follow up since those posts there are now over 4,500 "fans" on Facebook and dozens of videos with thousands of views on the YouTube channel.

Now Mayo Clinic recently announced the launch of its culture blog, Sharing Mayo Clinic, which provides an online site for patients and employees to share their stories about what makes Mayo Clinic unique.

There are some participation guidelines for people who wish to share content as well as instructions for employees that I think are applicable for any blogger who works for a corporation.

There is an interesting video with Lee Aase who himself has an interesting blog at SMUG.

The video highlights the reasons for implementing this "21st century technology" of "word of mouth" that has served Mayo Clinic well for the past 100 years for patients and staff alike.   

This is another example of Medicine 2.0 that is making medicine more transparent, allowing everyone to share their experiences as a "publisher", exchanging, sharing and commenting.  

I have begun speaking about Pathology 2.0 that I think will make pathology and the practice of pathology more transparent than ever before.  Content and information (the collective intellectual property of a pathology department) can now be shared like never before which is disruptive for some pathologists but I believe, will offer numerous opportunities for pathologists.
 

“Mayo Clinic’s reputation has been built by patients sharing their personal Mayo stories with family members and friends,” says Lee Aase, Mayo Clinic’s manager of social media and syndication. “Many patients share their Mayo experiences with others when they go home. Sharing Mayo Clinic offers a place for this worldwide community of patients and providers to gather and tell their stories.”

“Patient feature stories are among the most popular pages on our MayoClinic.org Web site,” says Thoralf Sundt, M.D., a Mayo Clinic cardiovascular surgeon. “This new blog will enable many more patients and their families to share their Mayo Clinic experience in their own words. In turn, we at Mayo Clinic look forward to learning how to preserve those services that are of most value, how we might improve those that can be strengthened, and enhance the health care experience for all of our patients in the future.”

Sharing Mayo Clinic builds on Mayo Clinic’s existing social media intiatives, including this news blog, as well as:

January 20, 2009

Personal health information in 2019

Personal health information in 2019

When our drugs, medical devices and wellness tools become smart, and when the resulting personal health information is linked to mobile and internet-based systems, who or what is going to control all that?  A poll was conducted to find out what people think the use and control of such personal information will look like in ten years from now:

poll-question

The poll was done on the LinkedIn business social network. LinkedIn provided a very quick and easy way to poll (e.g., posting to completion was done in just a few hours), but the tool has some big limitations. The poll is small (54 responses) and not statistically significant because they place payment requirements on larger polls.  In addition, the wording length, and therefore the ability to convey the full meaning of an answer, is severely constrained by the LinkedIn tool.  You can find the complete results here, including analysis by respondent title, company size, job function, age and gender (membership required).

The goal was to contrast the current use of personal health data (controlled by providers like the Mayo Clinic) with three possible futures–control by consumer and health services-focused companies (like Visa does today for similarly sensitive financial information), control by the individual (like LinkedIn and Facebook allow us to do today for our personal relationships), and a bleak, out of control situation (like FEMA during Katrina).  55% of those polled think they will be in control of their personal health information in 10 years.  This endorsement of the future health-empowered individual was tempered by 40% who thought the situation would look either similar to today (like Mayo Clinic) or worse (like FEMA).  Only 3% thought the future of our health information looked like Visa.

poll answer

There are some interesting nuggets in the demographics behind the poll results.  People from medium sized companies had the most mixed responses: 44% Mayo, 22% Visa, 22% LinkedIn, and 11% FEMA.  Do these companies struggle the most with our current healthcare system and appreciate complexities that will shape and limit the future that others do not?  In the age demographic, the older the respondent, the less likely their answer was for a future that looked like the provider control of information we see today: 33% of age 18-24 bracket, 20% of age 25-34, 16% of age 35-54, 0% of age 55+. As we get older and increasingly confront disease and health challenges, do we recognize the need to control our health information more and not rely on institutions?  In the gender demographic, 36% of women vs. 15% of men thought our health information future looked like FEMA!  Do women see our healthcare system in ways men do not because they have a different window on their own care and that of their children and elderly parents?  If so, isn’t it critical that women have an increased voice in the development of health policy and new health innovations, services and products?

ook at Microsoft’s HealthVault, Google Health, and Patientslikeme to see where this is going. 

November 21, 2008

Blogging and pathology articles about blogs

Since starting this blog over a year ago I have relied upon "word of blog" from other physician bloggers (see: New Digital Pathology Blog by Keith Kaplan & The Bits and Bytes of Pathology), other digital pathology blogs (see: Medicine 2.0 at the digital pathology blog), online Medicine 2.0 conferences, blogs about blogs and talks at conferences and meetings (see: Medicine 2.0 Congress & Pathology Visions) to tell people about the blog. 

It recently occurred to me through a few calls and e-mails that some frequent readers did not know who was writing these articles so I added an "About" link on the sidebar.  In particular, for physician bloggers, doing so "anonymously" or without professional reference is not good blogging practice as I have written about.

It's perilous to generalize, but the typical academic blog entry comments on - and links to - a news article or an entry on someone else's blog. Most authors of academic blogs allow their readers to post short comments of their own.

A couple of months ago, I came across 2 articles in a pathology journal that commented on blogging and Web 2.0 in pathology, not the other way around. 

So, here is a blog post that comments on articles about blogging and Pathology 2.0.  I think that completes the loop...

Both articles appeared in the September issue of Advances in Anatomic Pathology.  One article entitled "The Blog Phenomenon Hits Pathology" by Dr. Brian Moore of Memorial Medical Center in Springfield, IL who blogs at Neuropathology blog writes:

"Pathology has not been immune to the allure of the blog, and has served as a creative and interactive outlet for pathologists around the world." 

Brian, Bruce Friedman, Jules Berman and a group of pathology residents and myself are among the pathologists and pathologists-to-be who blog.  Brian's comments are right on and I am sure the others in this small group feel the same way.

The strongest case for academic blogging is the freedom of tone. It also offers speed; the opportunity to interact with diverse audiences both inside and outside academe; and the freedom to adopt a persona less rigid than other forms of academic publishing or presentation.

Dr. Darren Wheeler of Quest Diagnostics wrote another article entitled "Online Slide Presentations".  Darren has written several similar articles in the same journal in addition to other publications related to his interests in gynecologic pathology.  Of www.slideworld.org, he writes:

"The freely available slide presentations, maintaining acknowledgement of authorship, also serves as a venue for promoting various institutions and practices." He includes the below screenshot in the article. 

While some of my colleagues here disagree with sites such as these and contributing to them (I have since added several more since Darren's submission), I think his comments again are right on.  What he is really touching on is the simplicity by which these Web 2.0 tools can be used and the impact your contributions to them can have outside one's own institution.  Again, like a blog, viewers can add comments or rate the presentations & share the content you post.

There is also no doubt that academic blogs and content sharing sites will provide a model for academic institutions and societies to externalize and share more of their content and expertise outside of their own centers and organizations and further distribute their own opinions & educational resources. 

I discussed this previously about my own institution's blog and YouTube channel as examples of this.

Ovidweb1

October 17, 2008

Is image sharing "social networking" that should be blocked?

An increasing number of pathologists share images for illustration and/or query "What is your diagnosis?" on cases whether for help or other thoughts or as unknowns once a case has been worked up and diagnosed.  These include sites such as Flickr, Photobucket and others. 

One in particular I check out from time to time is from a pathologist in Texas by the name of Ed Uthman who has posted thousands of pathology images on Flickr in addition to personal photos.  I use his examples for my own lectures and to teach residents as the images are generally of high quality and good examples.

Recently someone else on the listserv tried going to the site to view the images and apparently was blocked from doing so according to this post:

"And so, I just got on the phone with our local eHealth department at our local regional health authority. And the woman on the phone said that the instruction is to keep Flickr and other image sharing websites BLOCKED.

There is nothing else I can say. I am extremely angry having went the regular route of reasoning with IT department bureaucrats and having eventually had to speak to concrete walls.

She said Flickr is for "social networking" and has to remain blocked. I explained and explained but to no avail.

For the other colleagues who talked to IT departments and got Flickr unblocked, you probably have IT personnel with one drop more sense and logic than we have here."

Fortunately I do not have this issue at my institution but have seen this kind of thing from other IT shops including other popular sites such as those for web-based e-mail and other "social networking" sites. 

I think our hospital IT colleagues need to be sensitive about uniformly blocking "social networking" sites that often have other significant deliverables that health care professionals can derive benefit from by sharing their knowledge whether it comes in the form of image sharing, opinions, questions or discussion about the challenging issues we all face on a daily basis.  These Web 2.0 tools are enabling and highly informative and should be recognized as such as supported when IT departments have concerns that are contrary to that. 

September 30, 2008

MEDTING Atlas viewer

I have posted about MDPIXX before.  The company has recently changed their name to MEDTING to better reflect their desire to host and share content for collaboration.  Their platform and tools allow users the opportunity to have several forms of media hosted and shared for public viewing or private consulation. 

I had the opportunity recently to meet with their CEO, Mr. Miguel Cabrer whose background is in health IT and more recently in Health 2.0 initiatives, such as this. 

To date, I have uploaded over 4,000 gross and histologic images to their site for viewing. His team of programmers has created this embedded viewer using a flash application for image viewing.

Secured consultations, VTC, file sharing or public sharing, such as this are among the suite of applications they develop and support. 

The images can be key worded and searched or indexed with SNOMED terminology.

Educational Sponsors

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Feeds

  • http://www.wikio.com

Medicine 2.0


Search

  • Google

    WWW
    tissuepathology.typepad.com

StumbleUpon

Technorati

  • Add to Technorati Favorites

Zimbio

Photo Atlas

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    July 2009

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31  

    Google Analytics

    Site Meter